Why Medieval Fantasy is Not Inherently Conservative (or Inherently Anything Political)
“Oh Fantasy,” says my friend. “It’s inherently conservative.”
This debate flares up from time to time in author interviews, blog posts, and in the pub. (EDIT: Michael Moorcock essay here.)
And it’s true that Fantasy looks conservative (with a small “c”) or even “reactionary” since in its most typical form, it deals with quasi-Medieval European feudal societies in which male characters wield agency through violence, power struggles take place within the matrix of unquestioned hereditary aristocracy, and often hinge on what can best be described as destiny-determinism; “You are the chosen one!”
Responses to this includ,e on the one hand, appeals to the subversive power of any secondary world (since it reminds us that our own political arrangements are contingent on History) and to the sheer range of possible Fantasies, and on the other, conservatives compiling lists of books that reflect their politics.
However, my response to this is usually:
“PAH! WHAT WAS THAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU OVER THE CLASH OF STEEL AND THE ROAR OF DRAGONS! OMG THAT PRINCESS NEEDS RESCUING! EXCUSE ME I MUST FETCH MY FATHER’S SWORD FROM THE TOWER OF DESOLATION!“
You see, bringing politics into genre raises my hackles.