Last December I wrote about Sherlock Holmes & the Shadwell Shadows, volume one of James Lovegrove’s Cthulhu Casebooks trilogy. And this December, it’s on to book two, Sherlock Holmes and the Miskatonic Monstrosities. I wasn’t quite as fond of the second installment, though not because it’s a bad book.
As I wrote in that first review:
The basic premise of the… trilogy is that Watson made up the sixty stories in the Canon. He did so to cover up the real truth behind Holmes’ work. And that’s because the truth is too horrible to reveal. In a nutshell, Watson has written three journals, each covering events fifteen years apart, to try and get some of the darkness out of his soul.
The darkness exists because Holmes, with Watsons’s assistance, waged a career-long war with the otherworld beings of the Cthulhu mythos.
Somewhere in another Black Gate post, I calculated the percentage that Holmes is absent in each of the four novellas which Doyle wrote featuring the great detective. Lovegrove chose to use that novella model and it’s my biggest complaint about the book. Holmes and Watson find a journal and read it. It reminds me of the Mormon interlude in A Study in Scarlet and it takes up thirty-five percent of the book.
Fully one-third of this novel has nothing to do with Holmes or Watson. It provides background to the mystery, but it could be a standalone story and it would have no more tie-in to Holmes than an account of my going out to lunch yesterday.
The flashback takes place in Arkham and it is essentially a Cthulhu short novella. Lovegrove got to write a Lovecraft pastiche within a Holmes pastiche. Of course, these three books are aimed at fans of the Cthulhu stories, so it’s not totally out there. I’ve read stories by Lovecraft, Derleth and others. I don’t mind them, but I’m not a particularly big fan. So, I’m not the target audience for the trilogy.
Those who are avid Holmes and Cthulhu fans are likely to enjoy this second book more than I did. But the fact is that this was a third of the book with no Holmes and/or Watson.
Also, Watson seems particularly harsh towards Holmes in this book – not something I noticed in Shadwell Shadows. The only reason I deduced was because he blamed Holmes for Mary Morstan Watson’s death. That’s probably incorrect, though.
Which leads us to something I like about the series. Lovegrove gives us alternate versions of the whitewashed stories that Watson published as the official Canon. For example, the Baskerville hound was really an interplanar creature that Holmes and Watson attempted to send back via a portal on the Grimpen Mire. The Sign of Four was similar but still quite different from the version found in Lippencott’s. And Mary’s death – well, some ailment such as tuberculosis would have been a much better way for her to go.
Other cases and events found in the Canon are given alternate, and always terrible, explanations. Professor Moriarty is far more of a villain than was found in the pages of The Strand. The author doesn’t beat you over the head with a nonstop succession of references, but they are sprinkled throughout the two books so are and are deftly handled. I’d like to see Lovegrove flesh out some of those affairs in short story form. Now there’s a collection for Titan to put out!
Aside from the extended journal journey, the book resembles the first in that it should appeal to Holmes fans who like horror or Cthulhu fans who also like Holmes. Lovegrove clearly knows his Cthulhu and frames the premise well.
The opening chapter combines horror and action and sets the tone from the outset.
Finally, I love the look and feel of the covers, which are almost embossed. They look great.
Though this one was too much Cthulhu and not enough Holmes for me, I will be reading the trilogy’s conclusion next December.
The Thinking Engine
In last year’s post I also looked at Lovegrove’s The Stuff of Nightmares. I make it a two-fer again with The Thinking Engine. That book opens with a mummy pursuing Holmes and Watson. Lovegrove likes to grab the reader’s attention: No sitting in the lodgings at Baker Street as a client oscillates upon the pavement here (name that story!). There’s a notable guest appearance in an even that’s not quite as irrelevant as it seems and we move into the main story in chapter three.
A professor at Oxford has built what is essentially a supercomputer. It’s a thinking engine that is Holmes’ equal at solving crimes. A newspaper magnate puts up a substantial sum to pit Holmes versus the Engine to get to the bottom of a local murder. Both contestants come up with the same answer. More deaths follow and clearly there is something nefarious going on in the university town.
Familiar names surface and Holmes continues his battle with The Thinking Engine to the end. While I liked the premise, I wasn’t enamored with the last several chapters. I would have much preferred a different villain. Even the one who was falsely identified before the real one was unmasked would have worked a bit better for me. While there were parts of this book I liked, I preferred The Stuff of Nightmares. Lovegrove’s Gods of War is on my ‘To be read’ shelf, so we’ll see how that one, featuring an older Holmes, shapes up for me. I also purchased The Labyrinth of Death over the weekend and I like the description. So, while I wasn’t quite as big a fan of these two books as the pair I reviewed last year, I’m still a Lovegrove fan.
And next December, look for my thoughts on Sherlock Holmes & The Sussex Sea Devils, along with another of Lovegrove’s tales about the great detective.
Bob Byrne’s ‘The Public Life of Sherlock Holmes’ column ran every Monday morning at Black Gate from March 10, 2014 through March 20, 2017 (making an occasional return appearance!). He also organized Black Gate’s award-nominated ‘Discovering Robert E. Howard’ series.
He is a member of the Praed Street Irregulars, founded www.SolarPons.com (the only website dedicated to the ‘Sherlock Holmes of Praed Street’) and blogs about Holmes and other mystery matters at Almost Holmes.