Writing Anyway

Writing Anyway

Good afterevenmorn Readers!

This is going to be a personal post, brought on by the various, incredibly depressing discussions around A.I. and artistic creation. As I’m primarily a writer, or, at least, I’m hoping to make a living as a writer. I draw and paint as well, but those are things I do mostly for me and I’m not trying to make a career of that. Perhaps more than one of you can relate to the state of, well, creation right now.

From the game Detroit Become Human — a fantastic exploration of AI what makes a person a person

First, a note about A.I. I think there are some fantastic applications for it; particularly with what it can help do in the medical fields, just as an example. However, I don’t believe it belongs in the creative fields, and all I see of people using it in these fields are folks who want all the perceived reward of creative work, without ever having to put in the actual work.

It takes work to gain the skills to make art. It’s a work that is never perfected; always practiced, always changing and improving, experimenting and failing. Over and over and over. And here’ the thing, if you don’t enjoy that work, and many people don’t, then the creative fields aren’t for you.

Because here’s the thing about art; it is the act of creating it that makes it worth the time and effort. It’s not having finished a painting. It’s not about just having a painting on your wall. That does give an enormous sense of satisfaction, no doubt. But the act of creating it, of putting brush to canvas and pulling something beautiful out of the mind and onto something to be shared with the world… that is by far the worthiest part.

Image by Лариса Мозговая from Pixabay

When it comes to writing, I often hear writers bemoan the act of writing. Sayings like “I hate writing, I love having written” are everywhere. I, personally, don’t understand this take. I’m not saying it’s not valid, I’m saying I don’t understand it. The act of writing is work, yes. It requires discipline, of course. But the act of writing is glorious! The pulling of stories from my head and onto the page is an act of joy. I am never more content than when I’m sitting before the computer, writing. Of course there are days when I’d rather be sleeping, or when I just don’t feel like plinking myself on that computer chair. The words come more easily some days than others. And yet, there is no sense of euphoria I’ve ever experienced quite so strong as when I’ve finished a writing session.

My point is, it is the act that makes the completed thing worth it.

That so many people are missing out on that makes me quite sad, really.

And also angry.

Image by Patrik Houštecký from Pixabay

The anger is reserved for those who called themselves artists or writers, never having touched so much as a pencil or put text onto a page with their own fingers (in my case — typing is so much faster that writing by hand, and so I don’t have to slow my mind quite so much for my hands to keep up). Writing a prompt does not make one an artist, or a writer.

What you’ve done is simply commissioned a piece of art, except instead of commissioning a person, you’ve commissioned a machine. You are not an artist. You are not a writer. You are a patron who, irritatingly, refuses to actually support the arts. You are no different from a person who commissioned a painter for a painting, and then claiming you painted it yourself.

No. No, you did not. You commissioned it. You just elected to commission an environment-destroying plagiarism machine, instead of feeding a painter and their family (paying someone).

Image by Nile from Pixabay

A.I. written books are flooding the market, and making it harder for real writers to be discovered.

Worse, as A.I. improves, it is getting harder and harder to prove that your work is, indeed, your own. The fact that A.I. was trained on the stolen works of real writers, and it can now imitated writing styles so well that you could run a piece of genuine human-created writing and it will come up as 90% positively “created by A.I.”

There is already a case of a writer who lost his publishing contract because there was the suspicion of the use of AI. Jerry Falade’s book Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body gained a 2.4 million dollar contract with MacMillan. A contract subsequently lost when A.I. detection tools and industry rumours said the text was written with A.I. It’s a claim the author strenuously denies.

Are they lying? Or was their career ruined by a false positive. It’s absolutely impossible to tell.

It has become such a problem that writers are apparently changing the way they write to avoid coming off like A.I. They’re literally stripping texts of their own voices, of character, just to try and evade the accusations of using A.I.

Writing in this mess is maddening. And it’s all but obliterated whatever small hope I had of making a living with my writing. I can say I don’t use A.I. to write (or even edit) until I’m blue in the face. The mere accusation may be enough to end my career before its even started.

What is to be done? Nothing, really. You can ask readers turn their back on A.I. slop, to support real human writers. Many readers are refusing that call. Cheap books? Who cares whether its purchase feeds an artist? Many reader are answering that call. But what good does that do you if you come under suspicion of using it? Even if the accusation is false, the conscious reader will avoid your work now.

There really doesn’t seem to be any solution that I can see. So we must do what we can. And what we can do is create anyway. Paint anyway. Write anyway.

So I will. And am.

Hopefully people will eventually find my work, and will also believe me when I say it wasn’t written by A.I., but by me. In stolen moments — visits to the library on my way home from work. An evening while I’m waiting for the laundry to finish, or my dinner to finish cooking.

It’s slower going than I’d like. It’s hard to make the time or find the energy sometimes. But the work is imperfect, but it is mine, and the work is wonderful.

Write anyway. Write anyway. Write anyway.


When S.M. Carrière isn’t brutally killing your favorite characters, she spends her time teaching martial arts, live streaming video games, and sometimes painting. In other words, she spends her time teaching others to kill, streaming her digital kills… and sometimes relaxing. Her most recent titles include Skylark,  Human and The Timbercreek Incident.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
K. Jespersen

Agreed: It’s horrible that people are getting accused of using AI to write when they haven’t.

Agreed: People should write anyway.

Agreed: LLMs are often being unethically trained.

.

Thoroughly Disagreed: Writing prompts is not creative and makes you not a writer.
Now, I know you’re angry about AI and that that’s what’s coming through, here, but you make it sound like anyone who creates prompts is a venal, watered-down, credit-claiming dullard. To that I say, “Excuse me?!”
I have been involved with a certain game for (as of this morning) 14 years and 2 months. This game requires human writing and input to grow and develop; it always has. My writing comprises so much of this game that I am tracked among the top 5 contributors of all time, and that only tracks half of what I’ve done because they have no way of measuring all of the long-form lore writing that the developers have invited or that other players have commissioned or requested of me.
Nor does it track my over 10 years of coaching players in how to write for the game and WRITING PROMPTS for the players. Never, in all of my years in that game, have I ever taken credit for an idea that was written based on one of my prompts. In fact, for the sake of encouraging new writers, I have even let some people take public credit and contribution-tracking for things I wrote 90% of, just because they put a small twist into them. And do you honestly think that, after over 14 years of experience working with the same venue, the same lore, and the same people, that it takes NO creativity to come up with brand new prompts and scenarios every couple of days? Do you think that in writing prompts, I am not supporting the arts and am merely on some ego-driven quest to make writers dance on my puppet strings? Do you think that there is no skill or art in writing a prompt that captures writers’ interest and allows the flow of ideation, especially on the days when the prompter is so blocked, paralyzed, and helpless to pick up a pen that even the thought of someone else writing hurts?

Sure, be angry at the people who are abusing AI and the public trust. But give credit where credit is due: not all of us prompt-writers are prompting AI; not all of us prompt-writers are working toward our own glory; not all of us prompt-writers are writing prompts because we can’t write, ourselves. Some of us prompt-writers have developed significant, creative, and specialized skills that directly benefit writers new and old.

K. Jespersen

Thank you. Thank you for being willing to stipulate that prompts and prompt-writing take skill and have value. For what it’s worth, I DO agree with you that the output from prompting automated systems does not have the creative equity that the output from prompting human minds does.

…I feel like there was a “SCUD: The Disposable Assassin” comic about this. Something about huge drifts of discarded entertainment generated by competing automated systems, who ultimately got frustrated at not being able to create anything original. And SCUD short-circuited their content war by being a robot who didn’t want to become human, which was novel…? Gotta figure out where I put that anthology.

I’m sorry for jumping on you about this. “Writing a prompt does not not make one an artist, or a writer. […] You are not an artist. You are not a writer,” happens to be very close to what technical communicators (tech writers) are being told right now. “You don’t have any skills. You’re not a writer. I can do what you do by filling out a template.” (Well, darn it, who do they think made those templates in the first place? Who do they think does the research to generate better and more understandable formats? A scientific paper on neutron degeneracy does not turn into a children’s book by having a cartoon dog point at a pulsar diagram and use all of the jargon. An IKEA-style manual is not going to help someone differentiate if a juvenile is likely a victim of trafficking or of parental abduction. Those are both non-tech writer fiascos.) Getting the “you’re not a writer” message from multiple sources rubs a person very much the wrong way– especially if one of those sources is Black Gate.

Jim Pederson

Thanks for your thoughts S.M. I like the concept you present that using A.I. to create art is essentially just commissioning a machine to do the work. My use of A.I. is essentially spellcheck and reviewing grammar “correction” suggestions. I’m not at all tempted to use any of the A.I. aids that pop up – then it would no longer be my creation alone.

Greengestalt

A true creative is driven to create something regardless of the reward. It’s sad since there are SO many other ways to make MONEY but if that is a major goal doing anything creative save ways to cheat insurance clients out of $ (with AI) is the LAST thing one should choose. Sure, we’d like to be “The next — place famous writer / pop star here” but way too many trying and to get let into that position God or rather the DEVIL knows what you’ll have to compromise. I have a hypothesis that the Devil found a way OUT of his dealings with the Music industry since they were so EVIL, greedy and disgusting, even for his tastes -around 2010 and the music has enshi – ttified since then big time. We have that burning in us and MUST get it out – and the businesspeople will be there to exploit us, with or without AI. They are the “Other men with machines”.

IMO the real enemy is the handful of giant companies and worse “Private Equity” that monopolize the markets and are to use the Cory Doctorow term “En sh – ttificating” things… Cheap grey boxes for restaurants, garbage food from controlled sources full of chemicals and bad quality at 4x any sane price they HAVE to buy. A handful of Yawn-Buster movies with good SFX but seemingly made to FAIL so they can get tax breaks and bet against them via short-selling stock… And Comic books, DC/Marvel and a handful of sold out fake indies hidden behind the Funko pile. Funko piles are a good indicator of Private Equity influence, btw… And books – well I recently found out for the last TEN YEARS it’s been “White Males need not apply”. We don’t have official “News” but check it out with searches, it seems the big “Traditional publishers” are so big on “Diversity” they’ve totally cut off their base. No way would they even talk to HPL, REH, CAS, Dunsany, or any founders if they were alive and new writers today, though they make $ reprinting them and other classics about the ONLY money they make fair and square, then publish how they HATE them it seems…

I think an Ai companion would be good for a writer – as a silent partner and reviewer who helps you reduce kessel runs to parsecs, the barbarian to not have a 50lb sword and keep the ducks in order. Problem is they are being all censored due to whine buckets, anti-Ai Saboteurs and griefers trying to make Anarchist Cookbook stuff or generate illegal images. So Chat GPT is like the two plush assistants from the classic “Duckman” cartoon and the formerly uncensored Sudowrite is starting to choke on anything even approaching Gorean style. GrokAi is cool and Deepseek is good, but it’ll be running one’s own private model – or using private rental space for the future we’ll need for anything more edgy than Teletubbies… I don’t say this to use them to write FOR you but to help with creativity – all those lonely nights you are going to jump into bed but want to type but know it’ll be gibberish… And for decades there have been tons of random plot generators, etc. to help creativity flow – like Donjon for TTRPG purposes, some novels I tried to read seemed like someone used that (10 years before AI) and just filled in the skeleton of the plot…

What we need to do is break open these closed markets and get the Govern-NOT to eventually choke them out of tax breaks and bailouts. For instance, comic books. For all the “Hallp meee AISlop will turk murr Jurrb!” I’ve noticed most “Pros” are just people who use PhotoSLOP to TRACE googled images. Try Greg Land for a real thrill, he’s so bitter he traces Prono images – his women change body shape during a comic (for MARVEL) and they often look weird… Unless you imagine them in an “Adult Entertainment” pose. Hope they don’t order him to do Power Pack (their KID supers) or the man will end up jailed…! However most “Artists” just TRACE with PhotoSLOP googled images to make CORPORATE Slop. It’s been admitted the characters in comics do not change, same plots again and again, no character growth anymore. They are all just coming in to work to get their checks till the door is locked on all of them one day and (IMO) Blackrock gets a HUGE bailouts in stock margin sales and our tax $…

I think we need a “Human League” for comics, books, toys, games…breaking through the corporate monopoly on a consignment train… – First everything for indie comics needs to be analog mostly – the comics drawn outside the computer. Any reference OK (yes, even AI) but no tracing. Eye to mind to hand to PAPER. No camera obscura, lucida, lightbox…tons of tricks way before modern tech… The computer is just used to scan and prepare for print/web the final product. Yes, coloring also – if they worry they’ll botch a coloring job just photocopy/laserjet print a scan onto paper to color. Not trying to make Ukiyo-E the ONLY choice – but remove the CRUTCHES they’ve used for 2 decades now. This would create a new Underground/Direct market – then fans would pressure their local comic stores to carry them on consignment – when something sold, $ is split. The individual styles would return, true “Outsider” art, and both not be worth training an AI for but the “Rules” would change during drawing… Serious, think Bode, Lomax, Rick McCollum, Tim Vigil, Eastman and Laird, Crumb, Larry Todd, Gilbert Shelton… Imagine underground to 80s independent boom diversity with original characters and stories in display stands next to the DC/Marvel/FAKE indies…!? And do that for bookstores – let’s also pressure (by lobbying the FTC) for a Consignment section – where ANY indie can hammer out their own book, pay to have it printed even in tiny runs of a few hundred – and they travel in boxes around the country with others. IF they sell the $ is split up, if they don’t they go to the next store and next and at the end of the chain the writer can pick them up at the warehouse or let them trash them…

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x