The Purple Prose of Robert E. Howard

The Purple Prose of Robert E. Howard


The Sowers of the Thunder, a collection by Robert E. Howard (Zebra Books,
March 1975, and Ace Books, July 1979). Covers by Jeff Jones and Esteban Maroto

A personal rant this morning on the issue of: Purple Prose.

A criticism often leveled at Heroic Fantasy, particularly sword & sorcery and sword & planet, is that it’s full of purple prose. Purple prose is flowery and ornate, overloaded with metaphor and melodrama, and full of cliché.

We’ve all seen examples, but bad writing can be found anywhere, in any genre. It irritates me to see all writers in a genre lumped together. For example, I’ve heard Robert E. Howard called a purple prose writer. I probably turned purple in anger in response. Most of REH’s mature writing is remarkably lean, with seldom more than one, and often no qualifying adjectives for his nouns.

So why has Howard been tarred with the purple brush?

I believe there are three reasons. First, because of his fame, much of his very early writing has been published, including fragments and letters from his teenage years, and this “early” work has become grist for critical analysis. I’m glad we have the fascinating material we do from REH, but it’s not fair to judge him as a “writer” from this material. Much of it was not meant for publication, and almost all reflects Howard as a young writer finding his stride.

Thongor volumes by Lin Carter, from Berkley Medallion, Tandem, and Warner Books, 1969-1979. Covers by Vincent Di Fate, Jeff Jones, Gerald Wood, and Kevin Eugene Johnson

Second, Howard’s name often gets linked with those of his followers and imitators, most of whom were not nearly Howard’s equal as prose stylists. There’s purple prose to be found in many Conan pastiches but that’s NOT Howard’s Conan. Robert Moore Williams’ Zanthar series (previously discussed) is full of it but Williams is no Howard. Though I often enjoy Lin Carter’s writing, he was known to wax purple on occasion. Even Gardner Fox and John Jakes, whose work I enjoy, were not Howard’s equals.

Third, the labeling of Howard’s work as “purple” is often based on a misunderstanding of the realm in which he worked, and on the inability of critics to step outside their own narrow experience in making judgements. Howard used powerful words and phrases that evoked strong emotions. Strong emotions are suspect to many modern critics, who prefer the mild and subtle. There’s nothing wrong with mild and subtle, but Howard was not writing of mild and subtle subjects. Powerful emotions exist. They are legitimate grist for the writer and cannot be denigrated as purple prose.


Zanthar of the Many Worlds (Lancer Books, 1967). Cover by Jeff Jones

In addition, Howard’s realm was most often history or an imagined prehistory. To capture the flavor of that setting he often used words that are archaic in the modern world, words such as mail, host, flog, smite, phial, horde, plume, clangor, corselet, parapet.

To the critic, these words are “purple.” But nothing could be further from the truth. They are simple, everyday, working words; they are just old. Howard combined such words into potent phrases like (All selected from The Sowers of the Thunder)

1. The curved sabers shivered on his shield and armor…
2. To the Frank who had felt his talons in Syria…
3. The grip of powerful hands on rein and swordhilt…
4. Panting in flight toward the white walls…
5. The fight still swirled and eddied…
6. The mailed hawks…

There’s nothing colored here, except the edges of our imagination.


Charles Gramlich administers The Swords & Planet League group on Facebook, where this post first appeared. His last article for us was The Heroes of Fantasy Quiz. See all of his recent posts for Black Gate here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Matthew

I’d say Howard very good purple prose. So did F. Scott Fitzgerald though Howard told more interesting stories.

He did use a lot of adjectives and adverbs and according to some that’s a bad because….they say its bad. The reality is that he was deliberate in word choice including those. They were well chosen adjectives and adverbs. He also knew when to restrain himself which truly bad stylist wouldn’t do.

Charles Gramlich

he had a poet’s ear which lends a lyrical flow to his language

Aonghus Fallon

Criticising Howard’s prose style is a bit like criticising Frazetta’s work for being cartoonish. One complemented the other because they were – for my money – the defining practitioners of their particular genre. Plus I’ve never really seen ‘purple’ as a pejorative term. Horses for courses, etc.

By extension, I think Poul Anderson deserves Kudos for at least trying to be true to Howard’s unique prose style in ‘Conan the Rebel’. It’s not entirely successful, but it’s a worthy effort, while also making the reader aware just how hard it is to imitate a writer of Howard’s calibre.

Charles Gramlich

Certainly a lot of people have tried to imitate Howard and mostly without success.

Morgan

All you have to do is read REH’s (or any author) out loud to get a sense of the writing. It sings! The choice of words is beautiful and has a definite rhythm. The use of occasional alliteration gives it it’s poetic affect as well. It effortlessly rolls off the tongue. Also, I think Sowers of the Thunder is my favorite REH collection.

Charles Gramlich

Sowers is one of the few books I reread fairly often. I read at least the opening to those stories several times a year

Dragoness Eclectic

1. “Purple prose” is not bad, per se. It depends on the genre and the period. A Regency romance in the style of Ernest Hemingway would not work (except as parody). Extremely purple prose was par for the course in 18th century gothic novels.
2. Ignore the Booktok crowd, they’re idiots.
3. Some people don’t know “purple prose” from “uses words I don’t know”. Tolkien, who picked every word in his stories with care, gets regularly accused of purple prose and “describing things too much”. I much prefer Tolkien’s descriptions to David Weber’s “I will tell the story of a great scifi epic by setting it in innumerable faceless conference rooms and meetings.”

Charles Gramlich

I think you’re number 3 is the main point I’m making in the essay. And certainly the definition of purple prose varies widely. The different genres and fiction vs nonfiction certainly require very different approaches to style, as you say

K. Jespersen

In Weber’s defense, the conference rooms come more into play the further along he gets into a series. Increase in political machination leads to increase in conference rooms… which is fairly realistic.

(I don’t like the conference rooms, either.)

Charles Gramlich

I think this might have gotten attached to the wrong post.

Charles Gramlich

Never mind, I thought you were talking to me

K. Jespersen

Not a problem. The “Reply to” text is kind of small, in some interfaces.

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x