Return Home

David Soyka Reviews Prince of Thorns

Saturday, February 25th, 2012 | Posted by Soyka

prince-of-thornsPrince of Thorns (Book One of The Broken Empire)
Mark Lawrence
Ace (324 pp, $29.95, Hardcover August 2011)
Reviewed by David Soyka

This is pretty brutal.  Relentlessly brutal, right from the opening paragraphs:

Ravens! Always the ravens. They settled in the gables of the church even before the injured became the dead. Even before Rike had finished taking fingers from hands, and rings from fingers. I leaned back against the gallows post and nodded to the birds, a dozen of them in a black line, wise-eyed and watching.

The town-square ran red. Blood in the gutters, bloom on the flagstones, blood in the fountain. The corpses posed as corpses do. Some comical, reaching for the sky with missing fingers, some peaceful, coiled about their wounds. Flies rose above the wounded as they struggled. This way and that, some blind, some sly, all betrayed by their buzzing entourage.

“Water! Water!” It’s always water with the dying. Strange, it’s killing that gives me thirst.

And this the ostensible hero talking in Prince of Thorns, the first in a (you guessed it) projected trilogy collectively called The Broken Empire.  So, we’re clearly in anti-hero land, in the “shit and blood” sub genre of sword and sorcery that aims to rub your face in what rusty blades, poor sanitation and disease actually do to people living under medieval conditions, in stark contrast to high fantasy depictions of noble quests in which divinely provident good triumphs over corrupt and therefore ultimately doomed to fail evil.

Now, it’s been awhile since morally ambiguous characters bring anything new to the genre (and, really, if you look at some of the source material for epic fantasy, it’s really nothing new).  Nor, for that matter, is the notion of a medieval-era protagonist who cracks wise like the stereotypical smart-ass kid in a modern sitcom. In fact, maybe it’s getting a little tired.

That said, Mark Lawrence still manages to shake the dice a little differently in presenting a highly learned though thoroughly unlikable character (well, almost, as we’ll shortly see) as a first person narrator (which I don’t think is done all that much). Consequently, the focus here is entirely on Prince Honorous Jorg Ancrath, a mere boy of 13 (Barbara Tuchman in her A Distant Mirror makes the point that one reason that might account for the senseless cruelty and barbarism of the Middle Ages is most of the ruling lords and kings were barely out of adolescence), who kills without thought or remorse those who needlessly irritate him or get in his way, willing to sacrifice a loyal friend if need be, who must constantly modulate his rage so as not to slaughter everyone within his sight who manages to displease him in one way or another. All the other characters are largely secondary and, from the viewpoint of the storyteller, largely superfluous to the world as Jorg perceives it.

So, if this is the “good guy,” what are the “bad guys” like?

Well, they’re not very nice either.  However, this isn’t a completely amoral universe, though Jorg would like us to think it is. There are extenuating circumstances, which brings us to the “well, almost” part that renders Jorg not entirely unsympathetic. To begin with, when he was only nine he witnessed the murder of his mother and brother while pinned on the thorns of a briar patch, thrown from his coach by thugs under the employ of Count Renar and thought literally left to the wolves, helpless to move let alone intercede (though that probably saves his own life). Worse, his father remarries and forges a truce with Renar as a matter of strategic convenience, leaving only Jorg operating on his own as a rogue to avenge the deaths of his family. So, you get where his anger management issues stem from.

Thorns, of course, are highly significant mythological archetypes, most notably the crown of thorns worn by Jesus during the crucifixion, which in turn signifies the fall of man. Lawrence is probably thinking primarily of the latter; it would be hard to conceive as Jorg as any kind of Christ figure.  The cover arguably has some Christian symbolism in that the various swords appear as crosses in what could be seen as a cemetery, though the symbolism in the book is perhaps rooted more in pagan notions of the union between the planes of the supernatural and physical worlds. Without knowing how much direction Lawrence had in the cover art, this may be overanalyzing. Suffice it to say that there is very little of the Christian, let alone the divine, in Lawrence’s world building. It is worth noting, perhaps, that Sam and Frodo take shelter of sorts in the briar vegetation during their journey through Mordor and in mythology thorns are frequently forces of magic intending to draw a blood sacrifice from interlopers; in nature, thorns serve little purpose but to inflict pain on trespassers, witting or otherwise. The latter is probably more what Lawrence has in mind.

Jorg’s philosophical worldview is that of the chess board, in which minor pieces must be sacrificed in order to capture a bigger prize. However, there are hints that Jorg himself may be a chess piece unaware of a larger game, rendering him more sympathetic as he struggles to rein in seemingly uncontrollable murderous desires he barely comprehends and that possibly is compelled from some supernatural realm. Whether that game is devised by the gods or by men will undoubtedly unfold in subsequent volumes. Without wanting to give too much away, there are more than a few suggestions there may be some literal game playing going on here, both in a rather funny scene in which Jorg and his companions attempt to breach a magical defense, along with continuing anachronistic references to  ahistorical figures such as Nietzsche and Sun Tzu. I’m hoping this isn’t going to resolve to a cliche that’s about as original as two stranded astronauts named Adam and Eve. Or, at least if it does, Lawrence has some twist in mind.

The next volume in the series is called King of Thorns (let me guess, the final volume will be Emperor of Thorns?), potentially set for August publication, and Lawrence’s blog promises an evolving Jorg who is older, wiser and more sophisticated.  Whether more likable, remains to be seen.

Then again, literature is full of unlikeable protagonists (Richard III anyone?) who nonetheless hold your attention, if only because they personify unfortunate tendencies that nonetheless are, alas, part of human nature. Lawrence maintains that he’s not trying to write any great exegesis about humanity, but is just trying to tell an entertaining story.

At that, so far at least, he has succeeded.


Read an exclusive excerpt of Prince of Thorns right here at Black Gate.

7 Comments »

  1. I’m impressed that with a cut&paste you managed to turn ‘black’ into ‘blac’ and ‘before’ into ‘beforee’ …

    I’ve heard that authors have essentially zero input into their covers, especially new authors.

    Not sure how the references to historical figures are anachronistic?

    Big fan of the book here. You may have guessed!

    Comment by Bryn - February 25, 2012 7:01 am

  2. You’ve got someone in a medieval fantasy setting quoting a 19th century philosopher. That’s anachronistic. To what end, I’m not sure.

    Thanks for pointing out the typos, which obviously were not the result of cut and paste.

    Comment by Soyka - February 25, 2012 9:53 am

  3. Ah. It’s just there was an excerp posted on this blog so I thought you could have cut&paste from there & maybe some spellchecker gone mad had screwed the text for you.

    Every review I’ve seen has concluded that the quoting of a 19th century philosopher implies the setting is not medieval. That would be my default rather than assuming the author is an idiot…

    Comment by Bryn - February 25, 2012 11:51 am

  4. No, I don’t mean to say that the author is an idiot, at all. I doubt this is as shallow as The Knight’s Tale (a movie that had its charms, though). Obviously, it’s a hint (among many) that all is not exactly as it appears. Now, where that’s going to eventually lead, namely who is pulling whose strings, could be interesting. Or, let us hope not, banal. Richard Morgan is doing something similar in his A Land Fit for Heroes series in suggesting that his fantasy world is not some parallel or different universe (or just made up), but some future Earth.

    Comment by Soyka - February 25, 2012 12:25 pm

  5. The World of this story is supposed to be an earth so far in the future it has gone full circle to an age of myth.

    I think we all know this is of the Smith Dynasty, though Lawrence like Skywalker may not know his true father.

    On the Sliding Scale of Myth-Truth, this seems to be going more for ‘Truth.’

    Take that with a grain of salt please, but you get my meaning?

    I’ll give it a shot maybe when it’s closer to completion.

    Comment by RadiantAbyss - February 25, 2012 3:03 pm

  6. A much better review than mine, which I will paste in full below:

    “I enjoyed it and look forward to the next one”. :)

    Comment by peadarog - February 26, 2012 10:53 am

  7. […] prince and a weary warrior. It is set in the same world as his previous trilogy The Broken Empire (Prince of Thorns, King of Thorns, and the 2014 David Gemmell Legend Award winner Emperor of […]

    Pingback by Black Gate » Blog Archive » Future Treasures: The Liar’s Key, by Mark Lawrence - January 1, 2015 1:11 pm


Comments RSS  |  TrackBack URI

 

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Black Gate Home
This site © 2018 by New Epoch Press. All rights reserved.