Weird, New and otherwise

Weird, New and otherwise

I’ve just started the Jeff and Ann VanderMeer edited The New Weird, a kind of anthropological excavation of a genre movement earlier in the decade that many of its adherents started to disavow once they got labelled with it (bad enough to be in the sf/fantasy ghetto and then get relegated to an even more narrowed niche), about which I hope to have more to say in this space at some later time. For now, though, here’s what China Miéville said about this when I interviewed him at the height of all the debate about what constitutes “New Weird.” And, as long as I’m touting my own miniscule involvement in the discussion, here’s something else I had to say about the supposed follow-up to New Weird — The New Wave Fabulists.

For some more contemporary comment, here’s the ever-hip Paul De Filippo on the latest nominations to the sub-genre.

Excuse the short post, but I think I’ve got some reading to do…

Notify of

1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Enge

Maybe I’m not enough of a joiner, but I could never figure out why people have to run around proclaiming these literary movements.

“I’m a Neo-Imagist with an overlay of Vorticism! Would you like to read my manifesto?”


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x