The Lost History of a Strange Planet Earth: Erich von Däniken’s Chariots of the Gods? and the Pseudoscience Bestsellers of the 1970s
![]() |
![]() |
Chariots of the Gods? by Erich von Däniken (Bantam Books, 1971)
In my last post, I mentioned Erich von Däniken’s Chariots of the Gods? to introduce a Ken Bulmer (as Manning Norvil) heroic fantasy trilogy. When I first read Chariots, as an imaginative young lad of 13 or so, I believed he was on to something, and I went looking for more “exposes” of hidden history.
Boy did I find them. The book’s success, which appeared in German in 1968 and in English in 1971, spawned a TV movie In Search of Ancient Astronauts (1973), which was hosted by Rod Serling. And almost immediately other and related books and films began to appear.

Older books written about similar “lost history” and about UFOs got new life and were republished in new formats. And new works on the theme continued to be published all the way to… now. Von Däniken continued to write them himself, until his death on January 10 of this year.
For about three years as a young teen I read quite a few of these kinds of books, with growing skepticism, and finally with a bit of ire at people writing fictions as nonfiction. I also began reading books that looked behind the scenes of such fare, like Crash Go the Chariots.
![]() |
![]() |
Crash Go the Chariots by Clifford Wilson (Lancer Books, 1972)
Note that I’m not advocating for anyone to read Chariots of the Gods? or any of the follow ups or even the “precursors.” I’m just showing you the ones I read. I don’t deny that the universe is a mysterious place and things happen that science does not understand, but I’ve been trained in the scientific method and the arguments made in these books are not compelling as real history.
I have, however, used these books in my college classes to teach students about skepticism and how to recognize science versus pseudoscience. Pseudoscience is often wrapped in exciting packages, and a characteristic of humans is that we love a mystery and love to “know” things others don’t. These kinds of books feed those needs, but — when treated as nonfiction — they actually retard our development of an understanding of the universe.

As I first explored these lost history books myself, I found there’d been a long thread of them before von Däniken, dating back — perhaps — to Plato and his writings about the lost land of Atlantis. In 1926 a British author named James Churchward wrote a book called The Lost Continent of Mu, and a sequel called The Children of Mu (1931), which I read in much later editions. A third Mu book (Sacred Symbols) was published just before Churchward died but reissued in 1972 on the heels of Chariots of the Gods. Mu had supposedly existed in the Pacific Ocean.
I also read Immanuel Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision, which was first published in 1950, where he advocated for a catastrophic history of our Solar System. Specifically, he argued that Venus had once been part of Jupiter, was expelled by the gas giant and sent on a course to its present location right through the orbits of Earth and other inner planets to cause great disruptions.

Although all these ideas have been rejected by science, they have inspired numerous fictions. I already discussed Ken Bulmer’s Odan series. Churchward is mentioned in some of Lovecraft’s short stories. Philip Wylie’s When Worlds Collide and After Worlds Collide owe a debt to Velikovsky, and quite a few of Lin Carter’s works, including his Thongor and Zanthodon series are based on these sorts of ideas.
When taken with the proverbial grain of salt, they can be great fun.
Charles Gramlich administers The Swords & Planet League group on Facebook, where this post first appeared. See all of his recent posts for Black Gate here.




There’s also Charles Fort, whose books inspired several science fiction writers (Eric Frank Russell is the only one whose name I can remember now). The chain of logic in books like this is: Chapter 1 – isn’t it at least possible that X is true? Chapter 2 – as we saw in the last chapter, X is true, which means that maybe Y might also be true, Chapter 3 – now that we’ve shown that Y is true…etc. But then I’ve seen reasoning like this in philosophy, religion, economics, and popular science books too.
I’ve only read a little bit of Fort but I know he was popular in this kind of thing.
I remember my uncle taking me to see the Chariots of the Gods (I think it had the same title as the book) movie, and being so blown away. I was probably 10 or 11, and the UFO craze was in full swing.
Big Foot and UFO’s; we just couldn’t get enough of that stuff back then.
I read a bunch of UFO books and the “MU” books by Churchward and lots of other stuff
I was wild about Von Daniken’s works all my life. Ever since I was a tiny kid watching TV in the late 70s with a black and white TV in a small house my parents had before they split up. I had these cool “Tiger Salamanders” that I’d kept as pets when I found them after the basement flooded and fed them bits of meat, eggs and mealworms. They were vicious tough little things but I’d hold them expertly in my small hands and they’d open their mouths with cartildge teeth for the worms eagerly. And I’d sit in times late in the middle of the night and early in the morning turning on a tiny B&W TV that was a hand down from my Grandmother.
The TV showed well a lot of stuff but the “In Search of” shows stuck in my mind. Mr Spock’s wise voice educating me about Bigfoot and the Bermuda Triangle. I wondered why Captain Kirk had to be a Cop. IMO it was a strong step down for him… Regardless I was captivated every time it was on and re-re-rewatched it. Of course I found the books and lots of other unexplained, paranormal, occult subjects. The libraries at the time, school and public, had tons of such books as aftershocks of the 1960s I presume.
So, I’ve loved the concept of Space Gods and other Unexplained stuff all my life. Someday I’d love to get control of funding for a big public museam and force them to include a Landsburg/Nimoy exhibit showing In Search Of and the movies and probably (for History channel funding) Ancient Aliens along with cool toys and science exhibits. Stuff like a prehistoric playset like a DFC set but including larger human figures for Nephilhim and aliens and ancient structures. Also Pyramid power sets for kids science fair kits. Maybe include an Astrology room and Alchemy lab also. AND all the proper NINE original planets… We’d do “Natural Energy” of whenever Freeman Dyson comes over to visit we’d give him a tube with a fan to shout into and his screaming would power a smal LED light I think…
A museum of that kind of stuff would be a lot of fun to visit. I’m surprised I guess that there aren’t more of those out there. We have a small local “museum” called the mystery house, which is really a touristy thing but fun. they have a faked crashed UFO and various kinds of supermonsters like a alligator/giant snapping turtle mix that they built. It’s fun.
The fundamentalists have “museums” like that, though they just pander to their peculiar fixation on Biblical literalism.
I don’t think I ever actually READ Von Daniken but, as sounds pretty common, I went through a phase when I was lapping up the “ancient astronauts”/”lost continent” stuff with a spoon. And I still think it’s kind of cool as an inspiration for fiction, at least.
I agree. I tell my students that fiction is the place for this kind of thing and it can be a lot of fun just as long as you hold any such claims up to scientific light in the real world.
Any relation of these books to Zecharia Sitchin’s 12th planet books? I haven’t read them but a friend was mad about them and pretty much paraphrased them to me during the occasional pub lunch.