<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short Fiction Beat: Tale of Two Magazines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackgate.com/2009/08/20/short-fiction-beat-whats-in-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2009/08/20/short-fiction-beat-whats-in-a-name/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Fantasy Literature</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Black Gate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Addendums</title>
		<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2009/08/20/short-fiction-beat-whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Gate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Addendums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackgate.com/?p=3095#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>[...] reporting the demise of Jim Baen&#8217;s Universe, I started wondering about the habit in genre fiction to use a famous author as a brand or a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reporting the demise of Jim Baen&#8217;s Universe, I started wondering about the habit in genre fiction to use a famous author as a brand or a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2009/08/20/short-fiction-beat-whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackgate.com/?p=3095#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>To be fair, Baen's was paying even better rates than Strange in at least some cases. They were also paying for art (and quite a bit of it at pro rates.)

I think one of the problems was distribution and word of mouth. Strange has been around for a long time and probably built up the audience over time.  When I used to talk about Baen's on forums--no one even knew there was a magazine.  Apparently distribution was a bit limited by Baen's original agreement with Simon and Schuster (they distribute Baen's books) also. 

It's never a simple formula that is for sure.  I enjoyed the magazine and am sorry to see it going by the wayside.  I generally only buy shorts/magazines here and there rather than subscribe (for various reasons) but in the last two years...I have only bought or read online/PDF magazines.  

I have purchased print anthologies though, but I'd probably buy those online too if offered.

Maria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, Baen&#8217;s was paying even better rates than Strange in at least some cases. They were also paying for art (and quite a bit of it at pro rates.)</p>
<p>I think one of the problems was distribution and word of mouth. Strange has been around for a long time and probably built up the audience over time.  When I used to talk about Baen&#8217;s on forums&#8211;no one even knew there was a magazine.  Apparently distribution was a bit limited by Baen&#8217;s original agreement with Simon and Schuster (they distribute Baen&#8217;s books) also. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s never a simple formula that is for sure.  I enjoyed the magazine and am sorry to see it going by the wayside.  I generally only buy shorts/magazines here and there rather than subscribe (for various reasons) but in the last two years&#8230;I have only bought or read online/PDF magazines.  </p>
<p>I have purchased print anthologies though, but I&#8217;d probably buy those online too if offered.</p>
<p>Maria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

