<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;On Thud and Blunder&#8217; &#8212; Thirty Years Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackgate.com/2008/12/05/on-thud-and-blunder-thirty-years-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2008/12/05/on-thud-and-blunder-thirty-years-later/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Fantasy Literature</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Black Gate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thud, blunder, and the hammer of the gods</title>
		<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2008/12/05/on-thud-and-blunder-thirty-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Gate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thud, blunder, and the hammer of the gods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackgate.com/?p=1277#comment-273</guid>
		<description>[...] read with interest Bill Ward&#8217;s entry two weeks ago about Poul Anderson&#8217;s famous essay, On Thud and Blunder.  While I agree with Ward that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read with interest Bill Ward&#8217;s entry two weeks ago about Poul Anderson&#8217;s famous essay, On Thud and Blunder.  While I agree with Ward that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NightHawk777</title>
		<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2008/12/05/on-thud-and-blunder-thirty-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>NightHawk777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackgate.com/?p=1277#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this.  

It's something I was trying to put my finger on a while back. 

I even started a post about one of these topics over on the official REH site about fighting styles.  You see these old black and white pictures of REH where he's either boxing, or has swords, or guns.  And my post was simply asking, what type of fighting skills did REH possess. It is obvious to me when you read any of the fight scenes that he really understood personal combat, the ebbs and flows of a fight, etc.  And there are intricacies to blade fighting that you might not pick up on, unless you have at least a rudimentary understanding of it.  Ah well, i find it to be quite fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s something I was trying to put my finger on a while back. </p>
<p>I even started a post about one of these topics over on the official REH site about fighting styles.  You see these old black and white pictures of REH where he&#8217;s either boxing, or has swords, or guns.  And my post was simply asking, what type of fighting skills did REH possess. It is obvious to me when you read any of the fight scenes that he really understood personal combat, the ebbs and flows of a fight, etc.  And there are intricacies to blade fighting that you might not pick up on, unless you have at least a rudimentary understanding of it.  Ah well, i find it to be quite fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Enge</title>
		<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2008/12/05/on-thud-and-blunder-thirty-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>James Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackgate.com/?p=1277#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this: I'm a big Anderson fan and it's a pleasure to reread this article. I first read it in that same volume, too, the Tor collection &lt;i&gt;Fantasy&lt;/i&gt;--a rotten title for a great book.

The issues have certainly changed in 30 years. It seems to me there's no lack of period detail in imaginary world fantasies--maybe too much detail, sometimes, obscuring the line of the story. But it's still the authentic points of concrete imagination that strike deep, and Anderson was a past master at those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this: I&#8217;m a big Anderson fan and it&#8217;s a pleasure to reread this article. I first read it in that same volume, too, the Tor collection <i>Fantasy</i>&#8211;a rotten title for a great book.</p>
<p>The issues have certainly changed in 30 years. It seems to me there&#8217;s no lack of period detail in imaginary world fantasies&#8211;maybe too much detail, sometimes, obscuring the line of the story. But it&#8217;s still the authentic points of concrete imagination that strike deep, and Anderson was a past master at those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Examining Poul Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;On Thud and Blunder&#8217; &#8212; BillWardWriter.com</title>
		<link>http://www.blackgate.com/2008/12/05/on-thud-and-blunder-thirty-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Examining Poul Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;On Thud and Blunder&#8217; &#8212; BillWardWriter.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackgate.com/?p=1277#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to read &#8216;On Thud and Blunder&#8217; &#8212; Thirty Years Later [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to read &#8216;On Thud and Blunder&#8217; &#8212; Thirty Years Later [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

